[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJLINK-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16712890#comment-16712890
 ] 

Gili commented on MJLINK-27:
----------------------------

Okay, I wasn't aware that this plugin is processing a list that was already 
processed by plexus-java to ensure that only the first entry exists per module 
name. That makes sense. You can go ahead and close this issue.

For anyone else running across this issue in the future, see 
[https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/blob/58e724cab3723a85dcf4bdbb2c121cb1a9a9773a/plexus-java/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/languages/java/jpms/LocationManager.java#L230]
 for the plexus-java filtering process.

 

Thanks Robert!

> Code incorrectly assumes that two modules won't have the same name
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MJLINK-27
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJLINK-27
>             Project: Maven JLink Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-2
>            Reporter: Gili
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: module-shadowing.zip
>
>
> Karl Heinz Marbaise closed MJLINK-7 referencing [a Stackoverflow 
> post|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46573572/java-9-possible-to-have-2-modules-with-same-name-on-module-path/46574200#46574200]
>  to prove that module names must be unique. In fact, this Stackoverflow post 
> says the exact opposite. The bottom half of the post states that modules in 
> separate directories **are** allowed to have the same name. The bottom of the 
> post concludes:
> {quote}That makes it possible to have the same module in different 
> directories.
> {quote}
> It doesn't have to be the same module per-se. It is possible for two 
> different implementations with the same module name to reside on the module 
> path, so long as the modules reside in different directory. This is useful 
> for "class shadowing". In my particular case, I ship a no-op implementation 
> of a module by default but users can insert a working implementation in front 
> of the module path to enable the feature.
> Please reopen this issue or continue its work here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to