[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16372508#comment-16372508
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SCM-869:
------------------------------------

GitHub user basinilya opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/67

    [SCM-869] fix gitexe list() implemented incorrectly

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/basinilya/maven-scm SCM-869

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/67.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #67
    
----
commit c50c7755d68b8d9c7a4aa46296724969cf58fcf5
Author: Ilya Basin <basinilya@...>
Date:   2018-02-22T07:10:20Z

    [SCM-869] fix gitexe list() implemented incorrectly

----


> gitexe list() implemented incorrectly
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCM-869
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-869
>             Project: Maven SCM
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: maven-scm-provider-gitexe
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.5, 1.9.6
>            Reporter: Ilya Basin
>            Priority: Major
>
> Taking the Svn implementation as a model, ScmProvider.list() should be 
> implemented as follows:
>  * The command must directly query the remote repository for files
>  * A local working copy is unnecessary and if it doesn't exist, the remote 
> repository must not be checked out.
>  * fileSet.getBasedir() indicates where to run the scm binary. The 
> recommended value is ".".
>  * fileSet.getFileList() indicates the files to list
>  * repository indicates the repo URL
> Git (among other SCMs) does not support listing remote files, so the command 
> should just fail.
> For listing files in a working copy, users should call the 
> ScmProvider.status() method instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to