[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16240636#comment-16240636
 ] 

Jesse Glick commented on MENFORCER-276:
---------------------------------------

FWIW while I have not looked at this PR, I would probably be opposed to using 
it in Jenkins. I consider it a key feature of this enforcer rule that the build 
fails if your test-scoped dependencies are inconsistent. We often had cryptic 
{{NoSuchMethodError}} mayhem due to simple POM mistakes before adopting the 
rule.

> Allow ignoring dependency scopes in RequireUpperBoundDeps
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MENFORCER-276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-276
>             Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Oleg Nenashev
>
> We have recently adopted RequireUpperBoundDeps in the Jenkins project 
> (https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/pull/67). In order to implement it, 
> [~jgl...@netbeans.org] added a support of ignoring particular dependencies in 
> MENFORCER-273.
> Sometimes we declare dependencies between plugins for testing purposes 
> (scope=test), and in such case RequireUpperBoundDeps fails the build if there 
> is a test dependency conflicting with the main code. Although it may cause 
> instability of tests (including false positive results), it does not really 
> impact the distributable package in our case.
> I propose to add another option for filtering of dependency scopes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to