[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018375#comment-16018375
]
Hervé Boutemy commented on ARCHETYPE-438:
-----------------------------------------
[~fbricon] if you have serious concerns, don't hesitate to create a Jira issue
and argue
> Remove support for specifying catalogs through direct URLs
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARCHETYPE-438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-438
> Project: Maven Archetype
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Generator
> Environment: n/a
> Reporter: Anders Hammar
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> It is currently possible to specify a archetype catalog through a {{file:}}
> or {{http:}} URL (via the {{archetypeCatalog}} param). This adds the
> possibility to go outside of the configured Maven infrastructure which causes
> problems and unpredicted side-effects.
> I strongly argue that the plugin should work with the Maven settings and
> infrastructure in place and not allow for going outside of this. For example,
> in a setup where there is a Maven repo manager in place, it should always be
> used and the user should not be allowed to side-step it through the support
> of the plugin. If an additional source should be used, it should be setup
> properly in the Maven configuration/infrastructure.
> I also believe the current support is a legacy from the old days when the
> catalog at central was not complete, but one had to used additional catalogs
> in the Internet.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
