[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOXIA-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15853916#comment-15853916
]
Vincent Massol commented on DOXIA-207:
--------------------------------------
I guess there are 2 ways of using JIRA. For me "won't fix" means that the
project doesn't want it fixed, which I don't believe is accurate in this case.
If someone comes in with a patch/PR you'd certainly apply it.
If your "won't fix" does't mean that you won't fix it but that you don't have
the time to work on it, then how to do you differentiate issues that you won't
fix because they shouldn't be fixed?
My POV is that JIRA is a backlog of issues to implement. It's not because an
issue stays 10 years or more that it's not a valid issue that doesn't require
fixing. IMO you'd be sending a bad signal to your contributors, telling them
that they shouldn't bother working on it because the project doesn't want it.
WDYT? :)
> Add events for recognizing words in the Sink API
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DOXIA-207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOXIA-207
> Project: Maven Doxia
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Sink API
> Affects Versions: 1.0-alpha-10
> Reporter: Vincent Massol
>
> See
> http://www.nabble.com/Need-for-onWords-events-%28and-more%29--td14557242.html#a14557242
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
