[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Scholte updated MSHADE-216:
----------------------------------
Attachment: MSHADE-216.patch
> Relocation exclusion pattern ignored
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHADE-216
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-216
> Project: Maven Shade Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Michael Nitschinger
> Attachments: MSHADE-216.patch
>
>
> Hi,
> I got a weird issue, maybe this is a bug. I have a rule like this, which
> works:
> {code}
> <relocation>
> <pattern>io.netty</pattern>
>
> <shadedPattern>com.couchbase.client.deps.io.netty</shadedPattern>
> </relocation>
> {code}
> Now I also have code which lives under com.couchbase.client.deps in a
> different source base that I don't want to relocate, because what ends up
> happening is I get:
> {code}
> com.couchbase.client.deps.com.couchbase.client.deps.io.netty
> {code}
> So I was thinking I use an exclude tag to get rid of that case:
> {code}
> <relocation>
> <pattern>io.netty</pattern>
>
> <shadedPattern>com.couchbase.client.deps.io.netty</shadedPattern>
> <excludes>
>
> <exclude>com.couchbase.client.deps.io.netty.handler.codec.memcache</exclude>
> </excludes>
> </relocation>
> {code}
> But it seems that this is plainly ignored (it has no effect). So I did it the
> hacky way which works, but I wondered if there is a propery way to do it
> through excludes (or there is a bug?):
> {code}
> <relocation>
> <pattern>io.netty</pattern>
>
> <shadedPattern>com.couchbase.client.deps.io.netty</shadedPattern>
> </relocation>
> <relocation>
>
> <pattern>com.couchbase.client.deps.com.couchbase.client</pattern>
>
> <shadedPattern>com.couchbase.client</shadedPattern>
> </relocation>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
