[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15446316#comment-15446316
 ] 

Vincent Massol commented on MNG-5576:
-------------------------------------

{quote}
furthermore if you use ${project.version} from where should it be taken?
{quote}

>From the resolved project's version.

What I don't understand and my comment is for this issue, not another one 
(otherwise I'd have created it elsewhere...), is why the restriction on 
{{revision}}, {{sha1}} and {{changelist}} property names. 

Re the list I'm not subscribed to the list (not been for years now) and I don't 
intend to join it. This was just a one-off question related to a specific jira 
issue.

> Allow continuous delivery friendly versions
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-5576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5576
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.1
>            Reporter: Jason van Zyl
>             Fix For: 3.2.1
>
>
> Currently warnings will be emitted when there are expressions in versions, a 
> few exceptions should be deemed valid to make continuous delivery easier. The 
> use case is to allow easy versioning of an entire multi-module build that can 
> take a version from an external source like SCM. These are the types of 
> exceptions that will be allowed:
> 1.0.0.$\{changelist}
> 1.0.0.$\{revision}
> 1.0.0.$\{sha1}
> When a whole build is versioned like this we can avoid churning the POMs in 
> the SCM which makes it a lot easier to see the actual changes in the project. 
> Not a complete solution for continuous delivery but is a step in the right 
> direction and doesn't interfere with currently behavior as it is currently 
> allowed, just warned against.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to