[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15356982#comment-15356982 ]
Daniel Wegener edited comment on MSHARED-494 at 6/30/16 12:20 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Sounds great! Did a first step just into that direction today :) https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/issues/48 Feel free to jump in if you want. I am still a bit concerned about the file ordering within the zip file - the order in which files in a directory are iterated depends on the OS/FileSystem - so there might be still some steps to go. But I'd feel much better if two builds on the same machine/environment would at least produce the same output. was (Author: dwegener): Sounds great! Did a first step just into that direction today :) https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-archiver/issues/48 > Impossible to generate a reproducible build due to timestamp in pom.properties > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MSHARED-494 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-494 > Project: Maven Shared Components > Issue Type: Bug > Components: maven-archiver > Affects Versions: maven-archiver-3.0.0 > Reporter: Emanuele Tagliaferri > Assignee: Michael Osipov > Priority: Minor > Fix For: maven-archiver-3.1.0 > > > Try to making a pom for do a reproducible build, meaning by reproducible > build the ability to produce the exact same artifact (same checksum) starting > from the same code, a two different times, i had some trouble with the files > generated in: /META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId/ > in the specific the /META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId/pom.properties > contains the timestamp. > digging in the code in the class: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/shared/tags/maven-archiver-3.0.0/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/archiver/PomPropertiesUtil.java?revision=1708674&view=markup > line 86 > is used the java.util.Properties#store which write the timestamp in any case. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)