[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Heinz Marbaise updated MENFORCER-225:
------------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.4.1)
                   waiting-for-feedback

> Add rules for mutually-exclusive profiles and banned profiles
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MENFORCER-225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-225
>             Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Rule API, Standard Rules
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Amardeep Sarkar
>             Fix For: waiting-for-feedback
>
>         Attachments: enforcer-rules.patch, site.patch
>
>
> I wrote 2 new enforces rules:
> * The ability to specify a set of mutually-exclusive profiles (p1,p2:p1,p3 
> would mean p1 can't be active with either p2 or p3). This has been discussed 
> on [this 
> thread|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24855678/enforce-exactly-one-of-two-maven-profiles]
>  on SO.
> * The ability to ban profiles (the contrary of {{requireActiveProfile}}). p1, 
> p2 would mean neither p1 nor p2 can be active for this build.
> Both of these rules support wildcards and consider inherited profiles as 
> well. I've attached a patch complete with unit test cases. {{mvn clean 
> install}} passes in local. These are built on v1.4 of the rules.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to