All child modules are forced to share the same parent POM
---------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: MRELEASE-151
                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-151
             Project: Maven 2.x Release Plugin
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta-4
         Environment: Windows XP
            Reporter: James Carpenter
            Priority: Blocker


Problem Description:
Assume the following layout:

fooProject/pom.xml
fooProject/dotnet1/pom.xml (has parent pom of maven-csharp-master-parent)
fooProject/dotnet2/pom.xml (has parent pom of maven-csharp-master-parent)
fooProject/dotnet3/pom.xml (has parent pom of maven-csharp-master-parent)
fooProject/java1/pom.xml (has parent pom found above it ../pom.xml)
fooProject/java2/pom.xml (has parent pom found above it ../pom.xml)
fooProject/java3/pom.xml (has parent pom of maven-fancy-framework-master-parent)

Assume fooProject/pom.xml lists dotnet1, dotnet2, dotnet3, java1, and java2 in 
the modules section.  Furthemore, assume that the dotnet modules all refer to a 
parent pom of maven-csharp-master-parent rather than refering to the pom shown 
at fooProject/pom.xml.  By changing into the fooProject directory one can 
successfully run mvn clean, and mvn install without any problems.  
Unfortunately, the maven release plugin has problems because it seems to expect 
all of the child poms to refer to the parent above them.

Motivation:
Any time a child pom needs a bunch of custom plugin's configured, its always 
nice to inherit the setup from a parent pom.  As it turns out, modules which 
should naturally be released and packaged together occassionally need to be 
configured quite differently.  This is certainly the case whenever dotnet code 
is co-released with java code.  The dotnet code requires a significant number 
of custom plugins be setup for any arbitrary csharp build.  It therefore makes 
a lot of sense to have a maven-csharp-master-parent to take care of this.  
These csharp related configurations are inappropriate for a java build.  In my 
case the java code happens to be a maven plugin which is executing the csharp 
code from a sister module (equivalent in example above would be for a plugin in 
fooProject/java1 to be executing code from fooProject/dotnet3.

Although the motivating example above describes the issue in terms of java and 
dotnet build interactions, its not at all unreasonable to think one might have 
java code requiring lots of plugins (say cactus configuration, etc) which would 
be inappropriate for sister modules.  Required differences in plugin 
configuration should not impose any constraints on which modules are considered 
to be released/packaged together.  Maven doesn't impose any such constraint, 
but the release plugin is.

Progress So Far:
I havn't taken the time to dig around in the release plugin and figure out how 
to fix this.  Currently, I am just manually performing what the release plugin 
would normally do for me.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to