[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2381?page=all ]

John Casey updated MNG-2381:
----------------------------

    Fix Version: 2.1

> improved control over the repositories in the POM
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MNG-2381
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2381
>      Project: Maven 2
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: Design, Patterns & Best Practices, Artifacts and Repositories
>     Reporter: Brett Porter
>      Fix For: 2.1

>
>
> some discussion: 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-users/200510.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> some questions raised by Chris Berry in relation to this:
> Let's take, for example, repos defined in settings.xml, in a parent POM, a 
> grandparent POM, and in the local POM . So for this case, what is
> The precedence level (if any) ??
> The search order of hierarchies??
> Are they additive??
> Can they be masked??
> How can one disable SNAPSHOTs completely ??
> There are times, mostly when cutting a Release, when you want to be very sure 
> that you are not using any SNAPSHOTs. How does one accomplish this??
> So can one then mask all repos except those seen in settings.xml??
> These need to be defined and documented as at present, however I believe this 
> yields the need for more control, particularly with relation to the latter 
> requests. Snapshot repositories should not be used in a release build, which 
> it would be good to define as building something that is not a snapshot 
> rather than tying it to the performRelease flag and the release plugin (or 
> imply the perform release plugin under these conditions regardless of the 
> plugin being used).
> It would be good to better mirror the repositories, and perhaps use the same 
> pattern to control this from the user end (so settings.xml might always use a 
> mirror for a given repository, block another one, and do these things under a 
> profile in some circumstances).
> I also have the overall goal of reducing traffic, so perhaps we need to group 
> dependencies under a particular repository too. I think this is filed 
> separately.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to