use of POM artifactId for svn report creates issues when file layout doesn't
match artifact names
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MPIR-42
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-42
Project: Maven 2.x Project Info Reports Plugin
Type: Bug
Reporter: Jerome Lacoste
Priority: Critical
See
http://mojo.codehaus.org/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin/source-repository.html
The webstart project is a multiproject plugin with the following layout:
webstart-maven-plugin/pom.xml (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin-parent)
webstart-maven-plugin/plugin/pom.xml (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin)
the ScmReport uses the artifactid and a URL built using the artifactIds to
construct the scm report information. E.g. :
private void anonymousAccessSVN( SvnScmProviderRepository svnRepo )
{
paragraph( i18n.getString( "project-info-report", locale,
"report.scm.anonymousaccess.svn.intro" ) );
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
sb.append( "$ svn checkout " ).append( svnRepo.getUrl() ).append( "
" ).append( model.getArtifactId() );
verbatimText( sb.toString() );
}
All generated svn information (web, svn command line) is then wrong.
Instead of
https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin
one should have:
https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin/plugin
Etc...
Should I really override all my pom.xml <scm> entries, or should the plugin be
smarter and use the file layout instead?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
