[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-366?page=comments#action_62233 ] 

Matt Raible commented on MEV-366:
---------------------------------

Shouldn't this POM refer to JDO (like 1.1.0-beta-4 did) rather than jdo-api?

IMO, it should be:

    <dependency>
      <groupId>javax.jdo</groupId>
      <artifactId>jdo</artifactId>
      <version>2.0-20050809.1515</version>
    </dependency>

Rather than:

        <dependency>
            <groupId>javax.jdo</groupId>
            <artifactId>jdo2-api</artifactId>
            <version>2.0-beta</version>
        </dependency>

The latter dependency doesn't download jdo.jar and I have to specify this as an 
additional dependency, which doesn't seem right.

> JPOX 1.1.0-beta-6 has invalid entry in POM
> ------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MEV-366
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-366
>      Project: Maven Evangelism
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Invalid POM
>     Reporter: Matt Raible

>
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>javax.security</groupId>
>             <artifactId>jaas</artifactId>
>             <version>1.0.01</version>
>             <scope>optional</scope>
>         </dependency>
> Should be:
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>javax.security</groupId>
>             <artifactId>jaas</artifactId>
>             <version>1.0.01</version>
>             <optional>true</optional>
>         </dependency>

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to