[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-511?page=comments#action_61816 ]
Matthew Beermann commented on CONTINUUM-511: -------------------------------------------- I haven't taken a stopwatch to it yet, but it certainly feels faster to me... also, Sun would tend to agree: http://java.sun.com/performance/reference/whitepapers/5.0_performance.html > Continuum should use Server VM > ------------------------------ > > Key: CONTINUUM-511 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-511 > Project: Continuum > Type: Improvement > Components: Core system > Versions: 1.0.2 > Reporter: Matthew Beermann > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1 > Attachments: patch.txt > > > Continuum could (should?) use the Server VM rather than the default Client VM > when running as a service. I'm not fully versed in all the differences > between them, but from what I do know, it seems much more appropriate. > This would involve adding another "wrapper.java.additional" parameter to > bin/win32/wrapper.conf (-server). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
