jpountz commented on code in PR #14293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14293#discussion_r1973122492


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TermQuery.java:
##########
@@ -165,6 +165,17 @@ public Scorer get(long leadCost) throws IOException {
           }
         }
 
+        @Override
+        public BulkScorer bulkScorer() throws IOException {
+          if (scoreMode.needsScores() == false) {
+            DocIdSetIterator iterator = get(Long.MAX_VALUE).iterator();
+            int maxDoc = context.reader().maxDoc();
+            return ConstantScoreScorerSupplier.fromIterator(iterator, 0f, 
scoreMode, maxDoc)

Review Comment:
   I think so, but I plan on having a potentially better way of doing it by 
reviving #12194 as a follow-up and skipping clauses that fully match a window 
(which would also remove the need for `MatchAllScorerSupplier`).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to