dungba88 commented on PR #12624: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12624#issuecomment-1828839806
Ah I think since we removed the finish(), getting the reverse bytes reader is expectedly slower. We have to copy the bytes to a readonly buffer every time. If this is a problem maybe let try to add the finish() again? WDYT The ram bytes used is an easy fix. I'll change it in next rev. The difference in number of nodes is interesting. Lwt me look deeper. But did the 9.x you are testing has incorporated the value-based node hash? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
