msokolov commented on pull request #536: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/536#issuecomment-1005868557
Thanks for the thorough testing, @mayya-sharipova. I think we want to minimize heap usage, the index size cost is small; basically we are trading off on-heap for on-disk/off-heap, which is always a tradeoff we like. The search time change seems like noise? So +1 from me. Also, glad to see the fanout numbers are sane :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org