sohailshk opened a new issue, #4306:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/4306
### Apache Iceberg version
main (development)
### Please describe the bug 🐞
Replacing a partition field while keeping its name, for example to change
the number of buckets, fails:
```python
from pyiceberg.catalog.sql import SqlCatalog
from pyiceberg.schema import Schema
from pyiceberg.transforms import BucketTransform
from pyiceberg.types import LongType, NestedField
catalog = SqlCatalog("default", uri="sqlite:///:memory:",
warehouse="file:///tmp/warehouse")
catalog.create_namespace("db")
schema = Schema(NestedField(1, "x", LongType()), NestedField(2, "y",
LongType()))
table = catalog.create_table("db.events", schema)
with table.update_spec() as update:
update.add_field("y", BucketTransform(16), "y_shard")
# Change the number of buckets but keep the partition name
with table.update_spec() as update:
update.remove_field("y_shard")
update.add_field("y", BucketTransform(32), "y_shard")
```
```
ValueError: Cannot add duplicate partition field name: y_shard
```
`UpdateSpec.add_field` checks whether the id of the *new* field is in the
set of removed fields, instead of the *existing* field with that name, so the
pending removal is never taken into account. Java's
`BaseUpdatePartitionSpec.addField` checks the existing field, allows the add
when that field is being deleted, and renames the deleted field to
`<name>_<fieldId>`.
### Willingness to contribute
- [x] I can contribute a fix for this bug independently
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]