szehon-ho commented on PR #18375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18375#issuecomment-6508263335

   @rdblue, #1981 seems like a useful precedent here: it corrected the 
transforms and made inclusive/strict projections conservative for existing 
partition values. In [this 
comment](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1981#issuecomment-751026580), 
you also proposed a flag distinguishing tables created as v2 from those 
upgraded from v1, so unaffected tables could skip the extra partitions. The 
current Java implementation still applies those compatibility adjustments 
unconditionally.
   
   Would you recommend extending that compatibility approach here, with a flag 
considered separately?
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to