mbutrovich commented on PR #17162: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17162#issuecomment-4958373463
> I'm curious what the community thinks about where we draw the line for strictly non-iceberg projects being mentioned in these blog posts. I think that's part of this process that we want to refine. Comet had an accepted Iceberg Summit talk in 2026 and 2025, so it seems within scope on that precedent. But that doesn't necessarily mean every Iceberg Summit topic makes sense for a blog post, or that talks that didn't fit in Iceberg Summit shouldn't be a post here. I'm just raising it as a calibration point. I'm also happy to adjust the tone in specific directions based on feedback. Right now I think it strikes a nice balance of "building with Iceberg" and "building within Iceberg" but I'm always happy for more fresh eyes. Thanks for your feedback so far, @Kurtiscwright! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
