Revanth14 commented on PR #1169: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1169#issuecomment-4637857836
@tanmayrauth Thanks for reviewing. Yes, that behavior is intentional, delete should only remove the exact ref state the user observed. If the ref head advances due to a concurrent append, the requirement fails and the user can re-run against the latest state. I updated the code comment to make that explicit. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
