singhpk234 commented on code in PR #14822: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14822#discussion_r2629990416
########## spark/v4.0/spark-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/extensions/TestRemoteScanPlanning.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.iceberg.spark.extensions; + +import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; + +import org.apache.iceberg.CatalogProperties; +import org.apache.iceberg.ParameterizedTestExtension; +import org.apache.iceberg.Parameters; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap; +import org.apache.iceberg.rest.RESTCatalogProperties; +import org.apache.iceberg.spark.SparkCatalogConfig; +import org.apache.iceberg.spark.sql.TestSelect; +import org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled; +import org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate; +import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ExtendWith; + +@ExtendWith(ParameterizedTestExtension.class) +public class TestRemoteScanPlanning extends TestSelect { + @Parameters(name = "catalogName = {0}, implementation = {1}, config = {2}, binaryTableName = {3}") + protected static Object[][] parameters() { + return new Object[][] { + { + SparkCatalogConfig.REST.catalogName(), + SparkCatalogConfig.REST.implementation(), + ImmutableMap.builder() + .putAll(SparkCatalogConfig.REST.properties()) + .put(CatalogProperties.URI, restCatalog.properties().get(CatalogProperties.URI)) + // this flag is typically only set by the server, but we set it from the client for + // testing + .put(RESTCatalogProperties.REST_SCAN_PLANNING_ENABLED, "true") + .build(), + SparkCatalogConfig.REST.catalogName() + ".default.binary_table" + } + }; Review Comment: My recommendation was mostly from POV that we need tables reads via remote scan planning can be written to as for normal tables flow and leveraging the existing test case specially in future addition to lets say geo type expression in the rest spec which can be used in filtering, one just add the test for that and remote scan planning will automatically be tested or will flag hey this is broken with remote planning. Regarding the metadata table not being read, we do want to atleast test that it works when remote planning planning is enabled (even though the client skips remote planning for it) But we can always build on it incrementally, need to be this PR :), totally make sense to move forward for this one ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
