Fokko commented on PR #2293: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2293#issuecomment-3162652246
> Should we also address this comment in the PR? https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2029#issuecomment-3152625389 Yes we can do that here as well, however, I think it is an extreme edge-case. This is only related to when the partition-spec is set, but the actual fields in the struct are not set. This potentially can cause data-incorrectness in V1 tables (because there the partition struct doesn't have field-IDs). I'm pretty sure that any Iceberg client won't produce such data, but it could be in the case of a poorly written add-files script that ignores partitioning. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
