liurenjie1024 commented on issue #1155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1155#issuecomment-2834139867

   > I believe there’s still value in maintaining an `iceberg-cli` integration 
separate from `iceberg-playground`or `iceberg-explorer`, which seem geared 
toward querying with SQL via DataFusion. A lightweight CLI could focus on 
exposing core Iceberg Rust functionality without overlapping with 
DataFusion-based query processing. Specifically I'm thinking of interactions 
with catalog or table APIs that are not scanning tables (e.g. list 
tables/namespaces, describe table and its schema, get/set properties on 
tables/namespaces, etc) which is similar to the PyIceberg CLI. Could we 
preserve `iceberg-cli` for such non-scanning operations and have a separate 
integration for this playground functionality that is similar to the DataFusion 
CLI?
   
   Yeah, I agree with that, and that's why we rename it to `iceberg-explorer`. 
We could have another epic issue to track developing `iceberg-cli`.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to