ion-elgreco commented on issue #700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/700#issuecomment-2791980480

   @kevinjqliu happy to hear that :)
   
   Yes, I think it would be easier to build the bindings from the ground up 
instead of trying to smash it into pyiceberg. One of the issues with 
delta-rs/deltalake was the long lasting dependency on pyarrow for the writer, 
and from what I see in pyiceberg it's mostly pyarrow.
   
   I need to read a bit more about what Iceberg supports, and then I can see 
where to start from. But I would like to work on write support with focus to 
expose it in python package, maybe (iceberg-rs) this would allow you to at 
least have distuingishment of pyiceberg.
   
   For the writer I think some datafusion code can be re-used from delta-rs, 
especially the lazy table providers for streamed writes
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to