set92 commented on issue #9960:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9960#issuecomment-2673967103

   @nastra I don't know how to ask this without it sound wrong. But is Iceberg 
ready for production? Because I would say that `UPDATE` is a common command to 
run, and it has been broke almost 1 year. 
   
   I'm using EMR, so for this issue seems my workaround is to do an INSERT, 
combine the previous column with the new one, and then delete the new one 
(basically doing an update manually). Because I can't go below EMR 7.0.0 that 
would be required to not have this bug. But is not the first issue that I find 
without many answers or acknowledgements, which lets me asking if Iceberg is 
ready for production.
   
   Again, I don't say it as an attack, but because I'm starting a big project 
on the company, implementing every table with Iceberg, and I'm concern about 
how the state of Iceberg.
   
   In my case, I'm running it from EMR Serverless 7.7.0, with S3 Tables.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to