ZENOTME commented on code in PR #569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/569#discussion_r1946187013
##########
pyiceberg/table/__init__.py:
##########
@@ -292,7 +303,13 @@ def _apply(self, updates: Tuple[TableUpdate, ...],
requirements: Tuple[TableRequ
requirement.validate(self.table_metadata)
self._updates += updates
- self._requirements += requirements
+
+ # For the requirements, it does not make sense to add a requirement
more than once
+ # For example, you cannot assert that the current schema has two
different IDs
+ existing_requirements = {type(requirement) for requirement in
self._requirements}
+ for new_requirement in requirements:
+ if type(new_requirement) not in existing_requirements:
+ self._requirements = self._requirements + requirements
Review Comment:
Hi, I'm not sure why is not `self._requirements = self._requirements +
new_requirement` instead of `self._requirements = self._requirements +
requirements`. If we meet something like `[requirement1(not in
existing_requirements), requirement2(in existing_requirements)]`, looks like
this code will include all requirement? Is something or context I miss?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
