pvary commented on PR #11497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11497#issuecomment-2589410701

   > @pvary @stevenzwu Could we wrap this up? I don't see any fundamental 
issues here. The only open point from my perspective is table refresh during 
planning time, but even that could be handled in a follow-up.
   
   @mxm: We decided to refactor out #11513 to make this work. Yesterday I have 
discussed this with Russell, and I will post a message on the dev list about 
the main remaining question 
(https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11513#discussion_r1877424024). We need 
to decide on how the future API will look like.
   
   We would like to build the Flink Maintenance above the new API since the 
current code would need serious code duplication.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to