paulcichonski commented on issue #1431:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1431#issuecomment-2543363646
This might be a simple fix, but I"m not exactly sure why the constructor is
structured like it is, so not positive if it breaks some other usage pattern
for `NestedField`:
```diff
diff --git a/pyiceberg/types.py b/pyiceberg/types.py
index 8fa7453..0a8c5e6 100644
--- a/pyiceberg/types.py
+++ b/pyiceberg/types.py
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ class NestedField(IcebergType):
data["type"] = data["type"] if "type" in data else field_type
data["required"] = required
data["doc"] = doc
- data["initial-default"] = initial_default
- data["write-default"] = write_default
+ data["initial-default"] = data['initial-default'] if
'initial-default' in data else initial_default
+ data["write-default"] = data['write-default'] if 'write-default' in
data else write_default
super().__init__(**data)
def __str__(self) -> str:
```
But if that seems good, let me know and I can PR it with tests.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
