kevinjqliu commented on issue #1106: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1106#issuecomment-2414839854
Thanks for the context and the workaround! I think the following steps will help us resolve this issue * In PyIceberg, allow reading `summary` without the `operation` field. Even though this deviates from the spec, it's what the current JAVA implementation supports * Raise an issue on the iceberg devlist about the deviation from Java (and Python) implementation from the spec * Raise an issue with Snowflake to write the `operation` field and align with the iceberg spec How does this sound? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
