kylebarron commented on issue #10260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10260#issuecomment-2258691857

   > Pushing 5+ different options that all have slightly different trade-offs 
onto the responsibility of the authors of readers/writers isn't going to lead 
to a great outcome
   
   💯 
   
   We had a lot of discussion in GeoParquet around CRS and PROJJSON emerged as 
the favorite. See https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoparquet/discussions/90, 
and in particular  
https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoparquet/discussions/90#discussioncomment-2663163,
 and https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoparquet/pull/96. For any system that 
doesn't have access to PROJ and wants to understand _something_ about the input 
CRS, parsing a WKT string is particularly terrible, while every language can 
parse JSON.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to