glesperance commented on PR #533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/533#issuecomment-2248379289

   I managed to get a poor mans append-scan with this 
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/240#issuecomment-2248323987
   
   Looking at this PR wouldn't it be simpler to implement append-scan in the 
api by adding a `append_scan` method to `Table`, then refactoring plan_files to 
take an optional snapshot_id, and providing a lightweight AppendScan class that 
makes 2 calls to plan_files and then compares?
   
   In my case there was no need for touching `__eq__` or `__hash__`


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to