glesperance commented on PR #533: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/533#issuecomment-2248379289
I managed to get a poor mans append-scan with this https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/240#issuecomment-2248323987 Looking at this PR wouldn't it be simpler to implement append-scan in the api by adding a `append_scan` method to `Table`, then refactoring plan_files to take an optional snapshot_id, and providing a lightweight AppendScan class that makes 2 calls to plan_files and then compares? In my case there was no need for touching `__eq__` or `__hash__` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org