liurenjie1024 commented on issue #232: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/232#issuecomment-2247838669
> @liurenjie1024 I would be interested to contribute. > > Let me maybe start with partition binding - i.e. binding an `UnboundPartitionSpec` to a schema - making it a bound `PartitionSpec` or re-binding to a different schema on updates. > > Do you have a strong feeling of where the code should go? As part of an `Action` or separately? If not, I would just make a proposal. Hi, @c-thiel Thanks for your interest. Typical I think small prs would be easier to review and test. That means, a prefered approach say one implement necessary api for `TableMetadataBuilder` in one pr, and add one Action with another pr. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
