jackye1995 commented on PR #10280: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10280#issuecomment-2116228474
I have a similar concern with @stevenzwu in the devlist: > With the agreed model of separate view and storage table, I am wondering if a separate materialized view spec page is needed. I think it would be nice if the table related field changes are in the table spec, and view related field changes are in the view spec for the completeness of those specs. But I also see the point that @wmoustafa made that: > I feel it is needed so the MV spec is not scattered across the table and view spec pages. What if we keep this MV spec page, but instead of describing the fields here, we make these pointer to the corresponding table and view spec sections? So this MV spec page contains just intro, pointers, and examples? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
