bk-mz commented on PR #10020: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10020#issuecomment-2051139254
@szehon-ho but this implementation is rather a hack, workaround around original design. Why folks you don't think just advancing version of the table and switching to bigger constant for partition spec offset (or going to negative ids just to remove set clash) won't be more clean for the implementation? This way we'd have a clear path forward, marking old spec for deprecation in future releases and having a stable mainline with actual code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
