CsengerG commented on PR #10042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10042#issuecomment-2020584976

   > So maybe we should just do "aliveStatusCodes": [429, 200]?
   
   Is the order of checking the links deterministic? If it is, then that can 
hide issues (page is not actually present, but by the time you get there it is 
a 429 --- what are the chances/do we care?). If the order of traversal is not 
deterministic, then we can perhaps ignore throttling (as you would expect to 
catch the dead links at some point anyway).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to