N-o-Z commented on PR #9789: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9789#issuecomment-1964153139
> I believe the purpose was that `CatalogHandlers.commit(..)` should only be used through `CatalogHandlers.updateTable(...)`. Is there a particular issue that prevents you from going through `CatalogHandlers.updateTable(...)`? AFAIU updateTable recieves a single UpdateTableRequest, and is used in the REST context to handle an `UPDATE_TABLE` request. On the other hand the `COMMIT_TRANSACTION` request receives a list of UpdateTableRequest and preforms updates on all requests as an atomic operation. I don't see how this can be achieved using updateTable -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
