javrasya commented on issue #9410: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/9410#issuecomment-1904744066
@pvary , thank you for that. You are right. It is all immutable so it makes sense that rewrite operation would create another snapshot and I should be using that not a prior one to that. After I refer to the `replace` snapshot which is created by `RewriteDataFiles`, the number of positional delete and equality delete files went way less. Not really sure if it would hit that 65kb limit with that, since I already downgraded to Iceberg version 1.3.1, but it definitely helped with read performance drastically. I will give it a try that way with 1.4.3 when I got the chance. Thank you both, it is so appreciated. @pvary @stevenzwu -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
