jotarada commented on issue #1617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1617#issuecomment-1745283095

   Hey any news related to this subject?
   This is relevant for us and would guess for other users when trying to 
introduce alluxio FS.
   
   We would like to have a load process that would write to object storage 
(table A pointing to fs://location) and then create a new table table pointing 
to alluxio fs mounted in the object storage (table A1 pointing to 
alluxio://location) and read from the same files. The problem today is even if 
we get the new table location in alluxio the metadata files and manifest files 
will be pointing to the writing FS instead of using the relative path from 
alluxio to get the files via alluxio and leverage the cache. Instead the files 
will be read from the FS ignoring alluxio, only using it to get the 1st 
metadata file.
   
   Does this makes a case for the relative path for manifests and metadata 
files?
   
   Or do you think there is another way to achieve such architecture? 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to