advancedxy commented on PR #7161: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7161#issuecomment-1689300761
> Perhaps we could allow multi-bucket/key definitions but I'd still restrict the routing/distribution to be based only on the first bucket (or something like that) to not overcomplicate it. Thoughts? Ah, yeah. it's definitely much simpler to routing/distribution by one bucket partition(first one or the one has the largest number of bucket, etc., a.k.a the most significant bucket transform). When multi-arg bucket transform is not supported, perhaps we may allow multiple bucket transforms in the table but choose only one bucket transform. Once multi-arg bucket transform is supported, the multi-arg bucket transform should probably to be selected first. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
