[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18008584#comment-18008584
 ] 

haosen chen commented on HBASE-29463:
-------------------------------------

I think the reason is that the barrier should not be set when the Region is 
back online after the RS crashes, because the WAL will also split when the RS 
crashes, so there is no problem that the old edit is pushed before the new edit.

> Bidirectional serial replication will block if a region’s last edit before rs 
> crashed was from the peer cluster
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-29463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29463
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Replication
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.5
>            Reporter: haosen chen
>            Priority: Major
>
> For two HBase clusters that enable bidirectional replication and set up 
> serial replication, when a region in cluster A received last edit from peer 
> cluster before RS crashed, the replication from cluster A to B will block. 
> Because in this situation, the HBase replication system will wait until the 
> last pushed sequence id reaches the new barrier but edit received from peer 
> cluster will never be pushed.
> When Region r1 in Cluster A pushes its last edit (e.g., seqID 58) to Cluster 
> B and subsequently received two additional edits (seqID 59–60) from Cluster B 
> and then the rs crashed, Region r1 will be reopened on another RegionServer 
> and set a new barrier at seqID 61. However, edits 59–60 will never be pushed 
> to Cluster B again, causing the _last pushed sequenceId_ to stagnate. As a 
> result, the {{SerialReplicationChecker}} will repeatedly fail its checks.
> The new RS will keep print DEBUG LOG:
> 2025-07-14 20:05:53,953 DEBUG 
> [RS_OPEN_REGION-regionserver/172.16.0.43:6002-0.replicationSource.wal-reader.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.regiongroup-1,1]
>  regionserver.SerialReplicationChecker: Replication barrier for 
> test1/46b4ecbd63d7fbcb16d68e106f904013/30=[#edits: 0 = <>]: 
> ReplicationBarrierResult [barriers=[23, 29, 68], state=OPEN, 
> parentRegionNames=]
> 2025-07-14 20:05:53,953 DEBUG 
> [RS_OPEN_REGION-regionserver/172.16.0.43:6002-0.replicationSource.wal-reader.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.regiongroup-1,1]
>  regionserver.SerialReplicationChecker: Previous range for 
> test1/46b4ecbd63d7fbcb16d68e106f904013/30=[#edits: 0 = <>] has not been 
> finished yet, give up
> 2025-07-14 20:05:53,953 DEBUG 
> [RS_OPEN_REGION-regionserver/172.16.0.43:6002-0.replicationSource.wal-reader.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.172.16.0.43%2C6002%2C1752216296629.regiongroup-1,1]
>  regionserver.SerialReplicationChecker: Can not push 
> test1/46b4ecbd63d7fbcb16d68e106f904013/30=[#edits: 0 = <>], wait



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to