[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17929258#comment-17929258
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28627:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.5
        [build #663 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/]:
 (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console 
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663//console].


(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console 
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/663//console].


> REST ScannerModel doesn't support includeStartRow/includeStopRow
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28627
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28627
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: REST
>            Reporter: Istvan Toth
>            Assignee: Chandra Sekhar K
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.6.3, 2.5.12
>
>
> includeStartRow/includeStopRow should be transparently supported.
> The current behaviour is limited and confusing, as the user would rightly 
> expect this to work via the REST interface.
> The only problem is that adding them may break backwards compatibility.
> Need to test if the XML unmarshaller can handle nonexistent fields.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to