[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

CaoShulin updated GUACAMOLE-1939:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Local host: Windows host
Remote host: Windows host
guacamole version: 1.5.4
Protocol: rdp
guacd:EulerOS 2.9 64bit | 4vCPUs | 8GiB

Pressure test guacamole with jmeter. After the pressure test is stopped, the 
guacd server will have a close_wait tcp link state. Close_wait exceeds the 
number established. And the close_wait number will not be reduced, but will 
accumulate. Details are as follows. Is the code not robust enough?

!image-2024-04-10-17-56-47-729.png!

  was:
Local host: Windows host
Remote host: Windows host
guacamole version: 1.5.4
Protocol: rdp
guacd:EulerOS 2.9 64bit | 4vCPUs | 8GiB

Pressure test guacamole with jmeter. After the pressure test is stopped, the 
guacd server will have a close_wait tcp link state. Close_wait exceeds the 
number established. And the close_wait number will not be reduced, but will 
accumulate. Details are as follows. Is the code not robust enough?

!image-2024-04-10-17-55-59-956.png!


> After testing guacamole, the number of tcp link states in close_wait exceeds 
> the number of established states
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GUACAMOLE-1939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1939
>             Project: Guacamole
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: CaoShulin
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: 1.png
>
>
> Local host: Windows host
> Remote host: Windows host
> guacamole version: 1.5.4
> Protocol: rdp
> guacd:EulerOS 2.9 64bit | 4vCPUs | 8GiB
> Pressure test guacamole with jmeter. After the pressure test is stopped, the 
> guacd server will have a close_wait tcp link state. Close_wait exceeds the 
> number established. And the close_wait number will not be reduced, but will 
> accumulate. Details are as follows. Is the code not robust enough?
> !image-2024-04-10-17-56-47-729.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to