[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17460410#comment-17460410
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-9788:
---------------------------------------
ezoerner commented on pull request #161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode-benchmarks/pull/161#issuecomment-995430162
My concern at this point is that even with no code changes the average
latency is showing over a 5% difference in average latency between runs. This
could cause the benchmark to fail in CI. This is based on only a couple runs,
though. I will try to run it again to get more data.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@geode.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Develop PubSub Benchmark Tests
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-9788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9788
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: redis
> Reporter: Wayne
> Assignee: Eric Zoerner
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Develop a suite of benchmarking tests for the pubsub API that benchmark the
> comparison between native Redis and the compatibility with Redis layer.
> +Acceptance Criteria+
> A benchmark should be developed that provides acceptable coverage (TBD) of
> the pubsub that allows us to monitor the performance over time and compared
> to native Redis.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
