[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17401419#comment-17401419
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-9500:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 2a321cf818adae6c8399e8f407d45b17db1eb669 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/develop from Darrel Schneider
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=2a321cf ]

GEODE-9500: clear deltaInfo even if delta not distributed

-- deltaInfo is now cleared right after region.put is called (#6760)
-- the size tests no longer clear it
-- the unit tests for delta needed to change because the deltaInfo is now 
cleared earlier

> RedisData keeps DeltaInfo references too long
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-9500
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9500
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: redis
>            Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>            Assignee: Darrel Schneider
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.15.0
>
>
> The current implementation of Delta for RedisData does not clear the 
> reference to the DeltaInfo until toDelta is called. This works fine in the 
> normal case but in the abnormal case it can case extra memory to be used by 
> the DeltaInfo instances being kept alive.
> What can happen is that if the extra server goes down so that geode is 
> running with one server then some optimization are done by geode and it never 
> calls toDelta. So in that case the DeltaInfo instances will be kept stored on 
> the primary.
> We actually have sizing tests that found this problem but those tests were 
> changes to clear the DeltaInfo reference in the test.
> Instead we should have these tests not clear it and change geode to clear it 
> in AbstractRedisData.storeChanges after the put returns.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to