[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17359664#comment-17359664
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-9146:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 01a69ebdbbc8e04ee3f2239756934850753bee82 in geode's branch
refs/heads/support/1.13 from Darrel Schneider
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=01a69eb ]
GEODE-9146: have idle expiration ignore timestamp on removed remote entries
LatestLastAccessTimeMessage now ignores the last access time
of both invalid and removed entries.
(cherry picked from commit e4e10ace74a8a74868690d0c78f97814380a566d)
> idle expiration should ignore destroyed or invalid entries when computing
> last access time
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-9146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9146
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: expiration
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.9.0, 1.9.1, 1.9.2,
> 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1.12.0, 1.12.1, 1.13.0, 1.13.1, 1.13.2
> Reporter: Darrel Schneider
> Assignee: Darrel Schneider
> Priority: Major
> Labels: GeodeOperationAPI, pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.12.3, 1.13.3, 1.14.0, 1.15.0
>
>
> When expiration is trying to determine if an entry has idle expired, it sends
> a message to the other members to determine the last time the entry was
> accessed. When that message, LatestLastAccessTimeMessage, checks for the
> entry it should ignore a destroyed entry if the expiration action is destroy,
> and it should ignore invalid entries if the expiration action is invalidate.
> But currently it does not ignore such entries and since invalidate/destroy
> also set the last accessed time, this can extend the expiration time on one
> member that has already performed the expiration on another member. Normally
> distributed expiration actions are done so this is not a problem but for
> local invalidates or destroys this can cause the entry to live longer than it
> should on some members.
> In particular this issue has been seen on partitioned regions that are
> configured with expiration destroy and eviction destroy. In that case the
> expire destroy becomes a local destroy even when a distributed destroy was
> requested.
> This issue has existed since geode 1.4.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
