[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16710774#comment-16710774
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-6151:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit f4de8eed44a0903cb07569b91ff0c0da55f6a191 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/feature/GEODE-6151 from [~dschneider]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=f4de8ee ]

GEODE-6151: use same term for JDBC mapping


> The jdbc-mapping commands should use consistent terminology when referring to 
> a jdbc mapping
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6151
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6151
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: extensions
>            Reporter: Darrel Schneider
>            Assignee: Darrel Schneider
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Multiple gfsh jdbc-mapping commands exist. They currently use the following 
> terms to refer to a jdbc-mapping: "mapping", "region mapping", and "JDBC 
> mapping". They should consistently use the term "JDBC mapping".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to