[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16446327#comment-16446327
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-5043:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit c303d01e408bc903f8ff5ac54b551618a4c5e782 in geode's branch 
refs/heads/feature/transcoding_experiments from [~geodeintegration]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=c303d01 ]

GEODE-5043: Buffering protobuf output to avoid multiple packet sends (#1768)

GEODE-5043: Buffering protobuf output to avoid multiple packet sends

Based on the stats all protobuf requests and responses were being sent
as two packets. Using a BufferedOutputStream to make sure we only send 1
packet


> Protobuf server and client are sending multiple packets for a single request
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-5043
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5043
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client/server
>            Reporter: Dan Smith
>            Assignee: Dan Smith
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While doing some performance testing, we discovered that the protobuf client 
> and protobuf server are actually sending multiple packets per request and 
> response based on the the LinuxSystemStats.xmitPackets. The messages are 
> small enough they should fit in a single packet.
>  
> Looking at the code, it looks like in both the client and the server we are 
> writing directly to socket.getOutputStream(). As soon as data is written to 
> that outputstream it could be sent to the the remote side. Wrapping that in 
> the BufferedOutputStream eleminates the duplicate packets and improves the 
> performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to