fresh-borzoni commented on issue #2998:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/2998#issuecomment-4187492451
@wuchong Agreed, benchmarking them together makes sense, #2948 avoids the
deep copy, #2803 moves buffers to heap, so together the direct memory OOM risk
should be eliminated while keeping the throughput benefit.
I've also opened [#[PR]](https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/3003) to fix
the LimitScanResponse buffer leak mentioned.
Happy to help with the benchmark as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
