Thanks a lot, Tiru. The searching function of my Outlook does not work well some times
Guilin. From: tirumal reddy <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, 7 April 2026 7:20 pm To: Wang Guilin <[email protected]> Cc: Valery Smyslov <[email protected]>; Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [IPsec] Re: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth-06 The version 07 has been announced on the mailing list; see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/VOlKEQu3kHf6ZtPNsUs2m1Un9Zk/. Cheers, -Tiru On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 at 13:48, Wang Guilin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It seems that the v07 version, uploaded on 1 April, has not announced in this list. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth-07.html I have one question here: Does this document no need to apply code points at all? The document specifies 3 ML_DSA algorithms and 12 SLH-DSA, according to Sections 4 and 5, as well as Appendix B. However, no Section for IANA Considerations, and also no code points for these 15 signature algorithms in IANA registry under the IKEv2 Authentication Method (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-6) Cheers, Guilin -----Original Message----- From: Valery Smyslov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, 30 March 2026 4:22 pm To: 'Tero Kivinen' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [IPsec] Re: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth-06 Hi Tero, I'm not aware of any IPRs related to this document and I'm willing to be listed as co-author. Regards, Valery. > While writing the shepherd writeup, I need to get confirmation from > each author that there is no IPRs known that are not already > submitted, and that all authors are willing to be listed as authors. > > So if you can respond to this email and specify those things. > > Ps. The current draft has couple of ID nits (in addition to my > previous comments to the draft), which needs to be fixed before I can > request publication (no IANA consideration section, reference to > RFC7296 in abstract). After you have responded to this email, and new > version of the draft has been submitted fixing the issues I pointed > out earlier (and the idnits), then I can submit this draft for the > publication. > -- > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
